EquinoxForum.net Bookmark and Share
February 19, 2017, 09:31:46 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Forum Tip: Click the little blue 'new' icon next to any topic to jump right to the first unread message.
   
   Home   Help Search Gallery Login Register  
Registered users see fewer ads.
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 2012 SRX Getting Revised Engine Lineup  (Read 509840 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
admin
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 339


Email
« on: February 02, 2011, 07:55:47 AM »

[imgr]http://www.gminsidenews.com/forums/gallery/data/603/medium/X11CA_SR003.jpg[/imgr]
Several weeks ago GMI broke news that the Cadillac SRX crossover was dropping its optional 2.8-liter turbo V-6. The news came as a surprise as the optional mill was responsible for providing the SRX near best-in-class power output. GMI has since learned the motive behind the axing of the turbo V-6.

According to engineering sources at GM as well as Cadillac dealerships, the 2012 SRX will receive GM’s familiar 3.6-liter V-6 as the only engine offering. The sources state that the engine will entirely replace the SRX’s current, anemic 3.0-liter V-6. The 3.6-liter will be GM’s new variant of the engine, dubbed ‘LFX’ based on the engine’s RPO code. Though the 3.0-liter could stick around for export markets to avoid higher displacement taxes.

GMI has not been told what types of improvements the LFX has over today’s direct-injected 3.6-liter, though speculation has suggested the engine will see a power increase from today’s 304 horsepower rating in the Cadillac CTS. The engineering source did state that the 3.6-liter is turning out to be a “perfect match” for the crossover.

The SRX is also slated to get a few other mild tweaks in 2012 model-year, including the addition of a heated steering wheel.

Cadillac's move to kill the SRX Turbo now seems rectified as the 2012 model with the 3.6-liter will likely have more power with significantly improved fuel economy over the former turbo. Stay tuned to GMI for continued updates about the 2012 model-year!

Source: GMI
Logged
NoobNox
Theta Freak
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1153





Ignore
« Reply #1 on: February 02, 2011, 08:19:25 AM »

At first I was thinking this sounds like a bad idea with gas prices rising and expected to continue the upward climb...Caddy buyers these days are upper middle class for sure, but not neccesarily wealthy enough where such things don't matter at all. Then I saw the part towards the end of the article where they claim the "LFX" will not only have more power than the version currently in the CTS, but also "significantly improved fuel economy over the former turbo". If this is true, then this is a good move...and something that could eventually trickle down into a sport model for the Equinox/Terrain. Cool
Logged

2010 Equinox 2LT Silver Ice metallic, 2.4 I4, 2WD, Titanium leather
dishdude
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 193




Ignore
« Reply #2 on: February 02, 2011, 08:46:56 AM »

If they replace the 3.0 with the 3.6  in the Terrain, I will NOT be happy! They should have just dropped the 3.6 in from the start.
Logged

2011 GMC Terrain SLE-2 V6 18" Wheels Olympic White w/Jet Black Interior
Terrain
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 698




Ignore
« Reply #3 on: February 02, 2011, 09:22:46 AM »

Fingers crossed for a 2013 Terrain Denali with the new 3.6L!!
Logged

2013 Lincoln MKX AWD

2011 Ford Edge Limited AWD - Sold

2010 SLT-2 V6 FWD Onyx Black/Jet Black, 19" Wheels, Nav 
Delivered - 7/16/10 Sold - 8/26/11

2010 SLT-2 V6 AWD Carbon Black Metallic/Jet Black, 19" Wheels, Towing
Ordered - 9/8/09 Built - 11/5/09 Delivered - 12/3/09  Sold - 7/16
paid4c4
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 6




Ignore
« Reply #4 on: October 27, 2011, 07:48:42 PM »

I had a 2012 SRX all weekend to try out and I must tell you the 3.6 makes a fine engine for the SRX.  I found it had plenty of acceleration and cruised great at 70 MPH.  I didn't have it long enough to make a determination about fuel economy.  I'm not saying I was impressed with it but I pick up our new 2012 Premium, Red with chrome wheels tomorrow.
Bill
Logged
KCorey
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 65




Ignore
« Reply #5 on: October 28, 2011, 04:28:58 PM »

I only have a few hundred miles on my 2012 Luxury, but I've noticed better fuel economy by driving with the car in "ECO" mode. It doesn't seem to affect performance at all.
Also, not mentioned in the owners' manual, the center armrest can slide out to 2 positions. The armrest is back when you can see the 2 pushbuttons. Just put your hand about 1 inch from the rear of the armrest and slide it forward.
Also not mentioned are the dry safe brakes. Look elsewhere on this thread for a more detailed description. You may have seen these described in the recent TV Cadillac ad.
Enjoy your new SRX.
Logged
GM Customer Svc
Theta Guru
*******
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 2771



Email

Ignore
« Reply #6 on: October 31, 2011, 12:52:16 PM »

I had a 2012 SRX all weekend to try out and I must tell you the 3.6 makes a fine engine for the SRX.  I found it had plenty of acceleration and cruised great at 70 MPH.  I didn't have it long enough to make a determination about fuel economy.  I'm not saying I was impressed with it but I pick up our new 2012 Premium, Red with chrome wheels tomorrow.
Bill

 Bill,

Congratulations on your purchase! If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me. Thank you.

Tricia, GM Customer Service.
Logged

For information on the GM Privacy Statement, please visit http://www.gm.com/privacy-statement.html.
paid4c4
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 6




Ignore
« Reply #7 on: November 01, 2011, 01:57:48 PM »

Bill,

Congratulations on your purchase! If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me. Thank you.

Tricia, GM Customer Service.

Tricia, Thank you for the comments and offer to assist with any questions or concerns.  I must tell you that my dealer Tompson-MacConnell Cadillac have been most attentive down to the smallest detail, their attitude has been most refreshing.  I left GM because of poor customer relations combined with a "I don't care" attitude.  I must say post bankruptcy there seems to be a different attitude and better quality products.  So far this transaction has been enjoyable, imagine that an enjoyable new car purchase!  CJ MacConnell was excellent to deal with and very product knowledgable.  It feels good to be back in the GM family.
Bill
Logged
GM Customer Svc
Theta Guru
*******
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 2771



Email

Ignore
« Reply #8 on: November 02, 2011, 09:49:21 AM »

 Bill,

I am glad to hear that you had such a good experience. I would be willing to pass along your comments with more information. Please feel free to contact me privately. Thank you.

Tricia, GM Customer Service.
Logged

For information on the GM Privacy Statement, please visit http://www.gm.com/privacy-statement.html.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines | Sitemap
©2017 EquinoxForum.net All Rights Reserved.
All trademarks referenced herein are property of their respective owners.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!